Second (methodological) debate: behaviouralism vs. traditionalism

Behaviourists: more rigorous IR through scientific inquiry & a science of IR = claims of methodological supremacy.
Traditionalists: defended more interpretive historical approach; international society, law, philosophy, history that could not be reduced to measurable variables.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Themes & Theories in International Relations
1. Theory & theorising
C. History of IR
Second (methodological) debate: behaviouralism vs. traditionalism
First debate: WWI-WWII idealism vs. realism
Fourth debate: rationalism/positivism vs. reflectivism/post-positivism
Third debate: neo-r'ism vs neo-lib'ism/pluralism vs Marxism/Globalism
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip