Machines can't understand language like humans

Machines' inability to distinguish the negation of the Gödel sentence from the Gödel sentence itself shows that matchines aren't able to distinguish any sentence from its negation—which is a requirement of natural language understanding.

Gödel’s theorem shows that machines can't have natural language understanding:

  • It is required of speakers of natural language that they be able to distinguish any sentence from its negation.
  • Machines can't do this for some sentences, as is shown by their inability to distinguish the negation of the Gödel sentence frpm the Gödel sentence itself.
Dale Jacquette (1987).
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Are thinking computers mathematically possible? [7]
No: computers are limited by Gödel's theorems
Theorems show limitations of machine thought
Machines can't understand language like humans
Gödel's first theorem
Gödel's second theorem
Gödel's and Church's theorems are psychological laws
Mathematical thought can't be fully formalised
Mathematics is an essentially creative activity
The argument from Church's theorem
A human can't simultaneously beat all machines
Machines may eventually have mathematical intuition
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip