Mechanism necessary for scientific understanding

Nature can't be understood conceptually without determinate mechanistic rules. Science proper is only possible in so far as we formulate mechanical laws of nature—which provide a firm mathematical basis for building theories about the universe.

Immanuel Kent (1790).

Notes: Kant both supports and disputes mechanism, because, on the one hand he thinks that mechanism provides the proper basis ofr science, but on the other hand he thinks that mechanism can't support critical (i.e. moral and aesthetic) philosophy. See "Mechanism can't support critical philosophy" Box 114.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Are thinking computers mathematically possible? [7]
Yes: Automata can think
Natural phenomena best understood via mechanism
Mechanistic philosophy is correct approach
Mechanism necessary for scientific understanding
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip