Natural phenomena best understood via mechanism

The human mind like all natural systems is mechanical. Mechanical explanations—like those employed in physics—provide the only necessary foundation to the rest of the sciences, including psychology.

Through the extension of the method of physics, mathematics can be brought to bear on psychology and make it a rigorous science.

Note:

This region of the map traces the development of mechanistic philosophy from Descartes to the present.

Strictly speaking all the claims on the seven maps deal with mechanism, because if machines can think then mechanism—in philosophy of the mind least—is vindicated.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Are thinking computers mathematically possible? [7]
Yes: Automata can think
Natural phenomena best understood via mechanism
Mechanistic philosophy is correct approach
Human thinking is computational
Man is a machine
Mechanistic biology
Artificial machines can't duplicate natural machines
Gödel refutes the philosophy of mechanism
Mechanistic principles can't explain the mind
Human functions can be captured by automata
Brains are automata, thus persons are too
Many human behaviors described algorithmically
Minds and automata have a finite number of states
Thinking is a rule following process
Humans have an infinite capacity machines lack
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip