Highly flexible systems aren't mechanistic

But a machine that generates new programs, treats its machine table is a changing object, and shifts between programs would involve auxiliary devices that can't be modelled on the Turing machine (as Dennett presupposes).

Dennett presupposes that a machine that can take the guise of multiple formal systems is a Turing machine.

The need for auxiliary devices that can't be modelled on a Turing machine means that the machine Dennett describes is not a mechanistic model of the mind.

Thomas Tymoczko (1990).
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Are thinking computers mathematically possible? [7]
No: computers are limited by Gödel's theorems
Gödel limits formal systems not machine implementations
Highly flexible systems aren't mechanistic
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip