comments
Respond
Comment on the article
Add a citation
Reply with an article
Start a new topic
Edit
Edit article
Delete article
Share
Invite
Link
Embed
Social media
Avatar
View
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Article ✓
Outline
Document
Down
All
Page
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Updates
Subscribe to updates
Get updates
Past 24 hours
Past week
Past month
Past year
Pause updates
Contact us
Some issues arising
Several issues arise from the memory accretion hypothesis. These are grouped here.
RELATED ARTICLES
Explain
⌅
The Arrow of Time
The Arrow of Time ☜A map exploring some issues concerning the nature of time that lie at the boundary of physics and philosophy. The map follows up a talk to the Blackheath Philosophy Forum on 2 April 2011 by Huw Price, Professor of Philosophy and director of the Center for Time at Sydney University.☜F1CEB7
⌃
The experience of time
The experience of time☜This branch of the map considers the phenomenology of time - the various ways in which time presents itself directly to our consciousness. Why do we think time has the features indicated by the passage view? The answers will hopefully enable us to connect the phenomenological to the physical.☜FFB597
⌃
Passage view components
Passage view components☜The passage view refers to three aspects of how we perceive time - that it flows, has a direction and that there is a distinguished present moment - and claims that each corresponds to a feature of the real world. These matters are considered in this part of the map.☜FFB597
⌃
Flow and direction of time?
Flow and direction of time?☜What underlies our sense that time flows - that there is a continuous process where the future is realized in the present and then recedes into the past? Are we directly observing a feature of the real world through the private door of consciousness (Eddington) or is something else going on?☜FFB597
⌃
Memory accretion hypothesis
Memory accretion hypothesis ☜At all times we are aware of a stock of memories of an ordered succession of events, each with a rough or precise time-stamp. We are also aware that the stock is being constantly added to - a process of accretion. This gives rise to the sense of time flowing in the direction that memories are added.☜59C6EF
■
Some issues arising
Some issues arising☜Several issues arise from the memory accretion hypothesis. These are grouped here.☜FFB597
↳
Implications for McTaggart
Implications for McTaggart☜If the Memory Accretion Hypothesis is correct what implications does this have for the debate initiated by McTaggart about whether tensed properties (past, present and future) or untensed relations (before, simultaneous with, after) are the correct way to order events in time?☜FFB597
↳
What about the future?
What about the future?☜☜FFB597
□
Direction is that of memory accretion
Direction is that of memory accretion☜By convention, we identify the forward direction of the psychological arrow of time is with the direction in which our stock of memories grows.☜9FDEF6
□
Memory accretion explains sense of flow
Memory accretion explains sense of flow☜The process of memory accretion gives rise to our sense that time flows. This explanation presumes that we can remember not just specific events and their temporal ordering but also the process of memory accretion itself - see citation from Julian Barbour for a similar (timeless) account.☜9FDEF6
□
Confirmed by introspection
Confirmed by introspection☜The Memory Accretion Hypothesis is confirmed by introspection. Ask youself why do I think there is a past? It is because you remember it. We also remember that the stock of memories is constantly being added to. Furthermore we infer that the process will continue, leading to belief in the future.☜98CE71
□
Graph of this discussion
Graph of this discussion☜Click this to see the whole debate, excluding comments, in graphical form☜dcdcdc
Enter the title of your article
Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Enter the main body of your article
Prefer more work space? Try the
big editor
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
November 2024
>
<<
November 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
44
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
45
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
46
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
47
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
48
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
49
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
Peter Baldwin
NodeID:
#115855
Node type:
Issue
Entry date (GMT):
8/23/2011 6:53:00 AM
Last edit date (GMT):
8/24/2011 12:58:00 AM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
0
Outgoing cross-relations:
0
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
Enter comment
Select article text to quote
Cancel
Enter
welcome text
First name
Last name
Email
Skip
Join
x
Select file to upload