The problem of consistency

The notion of consistency involved in Lucas's argument runs into difficulties for humans and/or machines.

Note: see Gödel second theorem.

Important Properties of Formal Systems

Consistency

A system is consistent if it is impossible, within the system, to derive both a statement and its negation. A system is inconsistent if a statement and its negation are both derivable.

In an inconsistent system, every possible statement (of its language) can be derived as a theorem, because everything can be logically derived from a contradiction. In a consistent system, that isn't the case.

Consistency is also referred to as the correctness or soundness of the system.

Completeness

A complete system will have a derivable theorem to correspond to every true formula in its language. An incomplete system will not be able to derive some true formula.

Decidability

A system is decidable if every true formula of the system has a proof and every untrue formula of the system has a disproof. A system is undecidable if there is some statement that it can neither prove nor disprove.

Note: The properties described here are stated in terms of logical systems; they can also be stated for formal systems more generally. For discussion of formal systems and their properties see Smullyan (1961). For further discussion of the properties of logical systems, see Hunter (1973), Anderton (1972), or Smulyan (1961).
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Are thinking computers mathematically possible? [7]
No: computers are limited by Gödel's theorems
The problem of consistency
Belief in one's own consistency leads to inconsistency
Gödel’s theorems don't apply to inconsistent machines
Inconsistency without explosion of belief
The mechanist's dilemma
We don't know that mathematics is consistent
Theorems show limitations of machine thought
Gödel shows machines can't be fully conscious
Argument from Gödel's theorem is dialectical
Mathematical insight is non-algorithmic
Improved machines
Gödel limits formal systems not machine implementations
Lucas may be a Turing machine
Lucas tricks machines into contradicting themselves
Some people cannot understand Gödel's theorem
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip