Penrose's intuition is irrelevant

The fact we can't see how algorithms could cause subjective states is irrelevant. The same problem arises with any physical explanation of subjective states. But being able to see an explanation doesn't mean that the explanation is incorrect.

For example, we can't see how—following Penrose—quantum wave packets could cause subjective states either.

Adina Roskies (1990).
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Are thinking computers mathematically possible? [7]
No: computers are limited by Gödel's theorems
Mathematical insight is non-algorithmic
Penrose's intuition is irrelevant
Alogrithms are fixed interpretations
The absurdity of algorithmic insight
Mathematical insight is not the important issue
Mathematical truth may evolve
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip