Self-programming machines are too rigid

Self-programming machines are too rigid to replicate human induction: they only approximate inductive methods. Humans use inductive methods that can't be formalised. We see this in two ways (see detailed text).

Self programming inductive machines only approximate inductive methods. Humans use inductive methods that can't be formalised. We see this in two ways:

1) Human induction is essentially a creative process that starts with an unspecified set of alternatives. Computers work only with specified alternatives.

2) The concept of probability—which is essential to induction—is flexible and is determined by the use to which it is put. Machines are constrained to use probability in ways that humans determine for them. Machines can't fit the concept of probability to new situations.

C.T.K. Chari (1963).
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Are thinking computers mathematically possible? [7]
No: computers are limited by Gödel's theorems
Improved machines
Inductive machines immune to Gödelization
Self programming inductive machines
Self-programming machines are too rigid
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip