Self programming inductive machines

Self-programming inductive machines have enough creativity to recognise the truth of Gödel sentences—and to beat the Lucas argument.

Argument anticipated by C.T.K. Chari (1963).
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Are thinking computers mathematically possible? [7]
No: computers are limited by Gödel's theorems
Improved machines
Inductive machines immune to Gödelization
Self programming inductive machines
Self-programming machines are too rigid
Some AI systems are inductive and probabilistic
A dilemma about inductive machines
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip