Consciousness-pill unhelpful

A consciousness pill doesn't act as a means of differentiating the mental from the non mental—an essential benefit of the connection principle. Hence, the pill isn't an extreme version of the connection principle and isn't helpful.

The consciousness-pill would do one of two things:

Either, the consciousness-pill would make all the activities of the brain conscious.

In which case, it wouldn't help differentiate the nonconscious from the unconscious.

Or, it would only make unconscious processes conscious,

In which case, the thought experiment is still unhelpful, because no basis is given fordescribing how the pill differentiates nonmental neurophysiological processes from mental processes.

In either case, the consciousness-pill does not act as a means of differentiating the mental from the non mental.

Because the essential benefit of the connection principle is that it provides a criterion for distinguishing the mental from the nonmental, the pill differs from an extreme version of the connection principle and is, as a thought experiment, unhelpful.

John Searle (1994).
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
No: computers can't be conscious [6]
Consciousness is necessary to thought
The Connection Principle
The consciousness-pill thought experiment
Consciousness-pill unhelpful
John Searle
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip