Judgments are grounded in phenomenology

Predication and judgment characterise the activity of the natural and human sciences. But such theoretical thinking is grounded in a more basic—phenomenological—life world of structures of bodily skill, tacit knowledge, and general understanding.


Predication and judgment—where objects are explicitly perceived as having certain properties and as falling into certain relations with one another—characterise the activity of the natural and human sciences.

But such theoretical thinking is grounded in a more basic life world of structures of bodily skill, tacit knowledge, and general understanding.

For example, the structure of space-time described by physics is grounded in a more basic "surrounding world" of in-front-of-me, behind-me, to-the-left-of-me, etc.

All the social sciences with their predicative judgments are grounded on phenomenonology—which studies consciousness and its forms.
 
Edmund Husserl (1954).
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
No: computers can't be conscious [6]
Consciousness is necessary to thought
Judgments are grounded in phenomenology
Consciousness before concepts
The Connection Principle
Thinking is essentially conscious
Conscious experiences not required
Consciousness is epiphenomenal
Consciousness is irrelevant psychology
No mental activity is conscious
Thinking doesn't entail consciousness
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip