No mental activity is conscious

None of the processing that results in conscious experiences is itself conscious—eg when we consciously see an image of a chair and a table standing out against a background, we have no conscious experience of assembling them to make a chair.

K Lashley (1956).

Note: Searle views his connection principal argument as being in part a response to this claim.

See the "Does the connection principle show that consciousness is necessary to thought?" arguments on this map.

RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
No: computers can't be conscious [6]
Consciousness is necessary to thought
No mental activity is conscious
Consciousness is necessary to thought
Consciousness before concepts
Judgments are grounded in phenomenology
The Connection Principle
Thinking is essentially conscious
Conscious experiences not required
Consciousness is epiphenomenal
Consciousness is irrelevant psychology
Thinking doesn't entail consciousness
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip