Can't reduce consciousness to physical processes

Physicalism explains appearances in terms of their underlying physical reality. But this distinction doesn't apply to consciousness, within which appearance is the reality. Consciousness isn't reducible to nothing-but some other physical process

An essential feature of physicalism is that it explains appearances in terms of their underlying physical reality.

For example, the appearance of lightning can be reduced to the reality of electrical discharge.

But it doesn't make sense to ask what conscious experience reduces to, as the distinction between appearance and reality does not apply to consciousness.

Within consciousness the appearance is the reality. So consciousness can't be reduced in the normal scientific manner as "nothing" but some other physical process.

Thomas Nagel (1974).
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
No: computers can't be conscious [6]
Consciousness is physical
Can't reduce consciousness to physical processes
Normal ontological reductionism doesn't work
What is it like to be a bat?
Causal reductionism
Phenomenal component only part of consciousness
A conscious robot is in principle possible
Building a conscious machine
Conscious robot would solve mind-body problem
Issue can't be settled a priori
Physical workings don't explain conscious machine
What about God?
What the scientist Mary doesn't know
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip