Issue can't be settled a priori

We should not assume that physicalism applies categorically to everything in the universe. Physicalism may be true for machines, or for humans, or for both. But there is no intrinsic a priori right way to settle the matter.

Keith Gunderson (1985).

A priori: Literally, "prior to" experience. A priori knowledge (in the form of concepts, propositions, or judgments) is knowledge gained or applied without recourse to experience of the world.

Proposed examples of a priori knowledge include that:

  • 2 2 = 4
  • all material bodies exist in space and time
  • God exists.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
No: computers can't be conscious [6]
Consciousness is physical
Issue can't be settled a priori
Keith Gunderson
A conscious robot is in principle possible
Building a conscious machine
Conscious robot would solve mind-body problem
Can't reduce consciousness to physical processes
Physical workings don't explain conscious machine
What about God?
What the scientist Mary doesn't know
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip