Implementable in functional system

Properly organized functional states generate consciousness. Such organization exists in the brain and can be built into computers as well.

Conscious mental states, like internal states, are best understood as states with chracteristic functional roles; similarly a mousetrap is really a mousetrap because of the function it serves, not because of any particular material, shape, or parts it might have.

Postulates Of Functionalism

1) A mental state is a functional state.

2) A functional state consists of causal imputs, causal outputs, and causal relationships to the other functional states.

3) A functional state is purely formal, abstract, and relational (see sidebar, "Formal systems: an overview" on Map 7).

4) So, functional states can be realised in multiple physical media. This is called multiple realisability (see the "Is the brain a computer?" arguments on Map 1).

5) So, we can study the mind without studying the brain.

Proponents on these maps include: David Chalmers, Jerry Fodor, John McCarthy, Brian McLaughlin, Zenon Pylyshyn and Hilary Putnam.

Notes:

  • This is a general description of functionalism many more specific versions have been articulated in the context of psychology, philosophy of mind, any eye, and connectionism.
  • Arguments about functionalism pervade Maps 3 and 4, and are prominent on Map 5.
RELATED ARTICLESExplain
Artificial Intelligence
Can computers think? [1]
No: computers can't be conscious [6]
Implementable in functional system
Computationalism
Consciousness is multiply realisable
Machine-state functionalism
The fading qualia thought experiment
Consciousness is information bearing medium
No: computers can't understand images [5b]
Yes: physical symbol systems can think [3]
Yes: connectionist networks can think [5a]
David Chalmers
Jerry Fodor
Zenon Pylyshyn
Hilary Putnam
Can never have a conscious experience
Computers are not introspective
Computers can't have feelings
Consciousness excluded by definition
Consciousness is necessary to thought
Mechanisms can't possess consciousness
Consciousness is physical
Higher-order representational structures
Let's just say robots are conscious
Rejection has undesirable consequences
Rule following doesn't deny consciousness
Graph of this discussion
Enter the title of your article


Enter a short (max 500 characters) summation of your article
Enter the main body of your article
Lock
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About
Enter comment

Select article text to quote
welcome text

First name   Last name 

Email

Skip