| STEP 2: Notis Tuntutan (bukti "jangkitan penyakit") Position1 #683982 https://naturalist-party.blogspot.com/2021/07/2.html
https://naturalist-party.blogspot.com/2021/07/3.html
http://plandemic.naturalistparty.net/p/b.html |
Klik sini untuk penerangan
Ruj Saya:
Tarikh:
A.R. BERDAFTAR / EMEL / SISPA
{masukkan nama pengadu di sini}
{masukkan alamat pengadu di sini}
_______________________________________________________________________
KEMENTERIAN KESIHATAN MALAYSIA
Blok E1, E3, E6, E7 dan E10, Kompleks E
Pusat Pentadbiran Kerajaan Persekutuan
62590 Putrajaya.
Tuan/Puan,
PER: SAMADA KKM MEMPUNYAI BUKTI “JANGKITAN” MENURUT SEKSYEN 2 (1) AKTA PENCEGAHAN DAN PENGAWALAN PENYAKIT BERJANGKIT 1988 (KOCH/RIVER'S POSTULATES)?
Perkara 4 (1), 11 (5) dan 150 (6A) Perlembagaan melindungi hak asasi muktamad, dan perbuatan Akta Pencegahan dan Pengawalan Penyakit Berjangkit 1988 (APPPB) material adalah torts dan jenayah jika tiada pembuktian mandatori elemen “jangkitan ertinya kemasukan agen penyakit berjangkit ke dalam benda bernyawa dan pembiakannya dalam benda bernyawa” menurut seksyen 2 (1) APPPB, seksyen 193, 217/166 dan 218/167 Kanun Keseksaan. | | Documented Controlled Experiment | | | APPPB | Peraturan Kesihatan Antarabangsa | Koch’s Postulates | River’s Postulates | | 1 | kemasukan | the entry | microorganism | Virus | | 2 | agen | agent | Microorganism found in the ill, not from the healthy person. Microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism | Isolation of virus from diseased host | | 3 | penyakit | health risk | | 4 | berjangkit | Infectious | | 5 | ke dalam benda | in the body | Microorganism grown in pure culture | Cultivation of virus in host cells | | 6 | benda bernyawa | humans and animals | | 7 | dan pembiakan | and development or multiplication | Produce same disease in host | Produce same disease in host | | 8 | dalam benda | may constitute | Re-isolation of microoganism | Re-isolation of virus | | 9 | bernyawa | a public | | 10 | | health risk | Detection of specific immune response to virus | KKM mengamalkan RTK-Ag dan mengesahkan ‘less accurate’ berbanding PCR untuk bukti ‘jangkitan’. Pencipta PCR mengesahkan "It/PCR doesn't tell you that you are sick," dan Mahkamah Rayuan memutuskan “If a person has a positive PCR test at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher...the chances of a person being infected are less than 3%. The probability of the person receiving a false positive is 97% or higher”. Pakar dalam Statement of Virus Isolation (SOVI) menegaskan “We are correct. The SARS-CoV2 virus does not exist!”
AMBIL PERHATIAN, PCR/RTK-Ag diluar Akta dan KKM tiada bukti ‘jangkitan’ sejak 2019 hingga kini, serta melakukan torts dan jenayah kemanusiaan. Justeru saya menuntut KKM mengisytiharkan bukti jangkitan s 2 (1) menurut SOVI/lampiran dalam (7) hari.
AMBIL PERHATIAN, saya bebas memulakan tindakan sivil dan jenayah seksyen 32, 130B, 212 dan 221 Kanun Keseksaan material dengan tiada rujukan lanjut kepada KKM jika bukti ‘jangkitan’ tidak dipatuhi menurut terma s 2 (1)/SOVI/notis dalam (7) hari. Terima kasih.
Yang benar,
..................................
Rujukan https://covid.nurembergcode.org
Lamp.
Repot Polis: ...............
Pengakuan KKM, RTK-Ag “less accurate” (link 1 dan 2)
Mahkamah Rayuan Portugal dan Lampiran Autoriti (1) dan (2)
Statement of Virus Isolation (SOVI)
Open letter from World Doctors Alliance
s.k. Ibupejabat Polis Diraja Malaysia |
| Edit details | | Page view |
Show >>Citations14Comments0HistoryInfo<< Hide |
CitationsAdd new citationList by: CiterankMap Link[2] Step 2
Publication info: 
Cited by: E D 8:20 PM 7 September 2021 GMT
| | Excerpt / Summary These particles are the isolated and purified virus.
These identical particles are then checked for uniformity by physical and/or microscopic techniques.
Once the purity is determined, the particles may be further characterized.
This would include examining the structure, morphology, and chemical composition of the particles.
Next, their genetic makeup is characterized by extracting the genetic material directly from the purified particles and using genetic-sequencing techniques, such as Sanger sequencing, that have also been around for decades.
Then one does an analysis to confirm that these uniform particles are exogenous (outside) in origin as a virus is conceptualized to be, and not the normal breakdown products of dead and dying tissues.2
(As of May 2020, we know that virologists have no way to determine whether the particles they’re seeing are viruses or just normal break-down products of dead and dying tissues.) 3
If we have come this far then we have fully isolated, characterized, and genetically sequenced an exogenous virus particle.
However, we still have to show it is causally related to a disease.
|
|