Defense and State Departments should perform USIP's public role
The US Defense and Diplomatic establishment should perform USIP's publicly funded peacebuilding role.

Congressmen Jason Chaffetz and Anthony Weiner, writing in the Wall St Journal, argue that:

"The USIP has a role to play in our modern world, but the level of taxpayer support that this private organization receives is excessive. Since 1985, taxpayers have forked over more than $720 million (inflation adjusted). That has included support for a gleaming new 150,000 square foot office building in the shadow of that other taxpayer-supported institution devoted to peace: the State Department.

President Obama has applauded recent pledges by Secretary of Defense Robert Gates to eliminate billions in unnecessary defense spending, but these cuts feel like a tough sell when we're using taxpayer money to fund a private organization. Our defense and diplomatic establishment has helped promote stability for hundreds of years, and it should be the place we invest taxpayer dollars intended to further peace."

CONTEXT(Help)
-
The Future of the US Institute of Peace »The Future of the US Institute of Peace
Congressional Funding of USIP? »Congressional Funding of USIP?
Withdraw Congressional funding »Withdraw Congressional funding
Defense and State Departments should perform USIP's public role
State Department is capable of performing USIP's peacebuilding role »State Department is capable of performing USIP's peacebuilding role
USIP's independence allows it to work in a way State Department cannot »USIP's independence allows it to work in a way State Department cannot
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About