Sorry, you do not have the right version of Adobe Flash player to view the content below. In the interim, we have provided an HTML view of the same content. Click framed items to drill down the debate tree.
The Crisis in Gaza *º
A map beginning to explore issues arising from the Gaza crisis. (#8987)
Was Israel's military action justifiable? *
Did Israel’s decision to launch major military action in Gaza conform to internationally recognized norms (encoded in the UN Charter and the Just war, jus ad bellum, criteria—e.g. the requirement for ‘just cause’, the exhaustion of alternatives and reasonable prospects of success?). (#9211)
Has Israel conducted its military operations appropriately? *
Has Israel’s conduct of military operations in Gaza conformed to the principles of international humanitarian law, including the requirement that attacks are only aimed at legitimate targets and that they do not involve excessive loss of civilian life and damage to non-military infrastructure? (#9212)
Legal status of Israel's attack on Gaza? *
What is the legal status of Israel's attack on Gaza under international law? (#8960)
What conceptual framework? *
What is the right conceptual framework for thinking about the conflict in Gaza? Such framework may be derived from ethical perspectives, theories about international relations, or other sources. The choice of framework is likely to determine and prioritize the issues to be considered. (#9245)
Just cause? *
One of the criteria for the resort to war to be justifiable under Just War theory is that there must be a just cause for the decision to initiate the war. (#9256)
Reasonable probability of success? *
One of the criteria for the resort to war to be justifiable under Just War theory is that the decision to initiate the war must be made on the grounds that there is a reasonable probability of success. (#9259)
Proper authority? *
One of the criteria for the resort to war to be justifiable under Just War theory is that the party prosecuting the war must have the proper authority to prosecute the war. (#9257)
Right intention? *
One of the criteria for the resort to war to be justifiable under Just War theory is that the party prosecuting the war must be prosecuting the war with the right intention. (#9258)
Proportionality of means and ends? *
One of the criteria for the resort to war to be justifiable under Just War theory is that there must be proportionality between the ends of the war and the means by which the war is waged. (#9260)
Reasonable discrimination in conduct of war? *
One of the criteria for the conduct of war to be justifiable under Just War theory , once the decision to resort to war has been taken, is that the conduct of the war must be reasonably discriminate (e.g. ensuring that only legitimate targets are attacked). (#9261)
Proportionality of conduct of war? *
Once the decision to resort to war has been taken, one of the criteria for the conduct of war to be justifiable under Just War theory is that the conduct of the war must be proportionate—by, for example, seeking to minimize casualties and destruction proportionate to the nature of the war. (#9262)
home details search share full key