Sorry, you do not have the right version of
Adobe Flash player
to view the content below. In the interim, we have provided an HTML view of the same content. Click framed items to drill down the debate tree.
Case for significant anthropogenic forcing remains unclear *
The case for significant anthropogenic forcing of the climate remains unclear. (#5041)
IPCC process, science and modelling are flawed *
(#37896)
Computer models aren't reliable yet *º
Climate change predictions are based on computer models that don't yet capture the full complexity of climate dynamics; as such the computer models are sufficiently reliable yet to be trusted. (#5032)
Key scientific measurements are subject to error *
Instruments show there has been some warming of the Earth's surface since 1979, but the actual value is subject to large errors. (#14732)
IPCC process isn't wholly reliable *º
The proccess behind the IPCC reports, on which much of the case for dangerous anthropengenic climate change rests, is not wholly reliable. (#5034)
Demand for 100% reliability is disingenuous. *
No human system is 100% reliable. The computer models are sufficiently reliable to indicate that we should take action to decarbonise the global economy. (#63024)