Alleged problems have been disconfirmed OpposingArgument #970

Task demands and experimenter effects do not refute scanning and rotation experiments (see detailed text).
Task demands and experimenter effects do not refute scanning and rotation experiments:

  • The claim that task demands caused subjects simulate how they would behave with real objects is disconfirmed by experiments that make no mention of physical motion. References to "physical motion" and "scanning" are replaced by phrases such as "glance up" and "shift attention".
  • The claim that subjects give answers they think the experimenters want to hear is disconfirmed by the fact that subjects often give responses that the experimenters didn’t anticipate. These responses could not have been suggested by the experimenters.
Stephen Kosslyn, Stephen Pinker, George E. Smith, and Steven P. Schwartz (1979).
PAGE NAVIGATOR(Help)
Map HomeArtificial Intelligence
IssueCan computers think? [1]
PositionNo: computers can't understand images [5b]
OpposingArgumentImages represented by filled cells in an array
SupportiveArgumentImages are Quasi-pictorial representations
SupportiveArgumentImage Psychology
SupportiveArgumentExperimental evidence
PremiseBehavioural evidence
OpposingArgumentScanning and rotation evidence is problematic
OpposingArgumentAlleged problems have been disconfirmed
AdvocacyStephen Kosslyn
CommentsAdd a comment
Metadata

Entered by:- David Price
Entry date (GMT): 8/22/2006 1:52:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT): 10/23/2007 9:10:00 AM
Incoming cross-relations: 1
Outgoing cross-relations: 0
Average rating: 0 by 0 users