Impenetrability doesn’t isolate basic elements OpposingArgument #961

The requirement that basic elements of functional architecture must be cognitively impenetrable is flawed as many body functions—eg digestion—are cognitively penetrable but still basic, and elements can change levels in the functional hierarchy.
The requirement that basic elements of functional architecture must be cognitively impenetrable is flawed:

  • many functions of the body, such as digestion are cognitively penetrable but still basic to many explanations;
  • the cognitive impenetrability condition assumes a fixed level for elements in the functional architecture. But functional element sometimes change levels in the hierarchy.
Mark Rollins (1989).
PAGE NAVIGATOR(Help)
Map HomeArtificial Intelligence
IssueCan computers think? [1]
PositionNo: computers can't understand images [5b]
OpposingArgumentImages represented by filled cells in an array
SupportiveArgumentImages are Quasi-pictorial representations
SupportiveArgumentImage Psychology
SupportiveArgumentImages are primitive, functional components of thought
OpposingArgumentImages aren't primitive explanatory concepts
SupportiveArgumentImages are cognitively penetrable
OpposingArgumentImpenetrability doesn’t isolate basic elements
AdvocacyStephen Kosslyn
CommentsAdd a comment
Metadata

Entered by:- David Price
Entry date (GMT): 8/22/2006 12:06:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT): 10/23/2007 9:15:00 AM
Incoming cross-relations: 1
Outgoing cross-relations: 0
Average rating: 0 by 0 users