Naming Israel in the declaration as a problem state Position #64311

As things stand, there is no consensus on whether Israel should be named in the declaration as a problem state.
PAGE NAVIGATOR(Help)
▲Map HomeNuclear Politics
▲IssueNPT Review Conference – May 2010
▲IssueNPT RevCon 2010 – Outcome Document
▲Issue2. NPT RevCon 2010 – Conclusions
▲IssuePoints of contention around the final draft?
■PositionNaming Israel in the declaration as a problem state
●ComponentEgypt wants Israel identified as a problem state
●ComponentUS is opposed to identifying Israel as a problem state
●ComponentUS prepared to support a Mid-East WMD-free zone Conference in 2012
◄RelevanceIsrael's deliberate ambiguity over its nuclear policy
CommentsAdd a comment
Metadata

Entered by:- David Price
Entry date (GMT): 5/28/2010 11:41:00 AM
Last edit date (GMT): 5/28/2010 11:41:00 AM
Incoming cross-relations: 1
Outgoing cross-relations: 0
Average rating: 4 by 1 users