Jack Copeland Protagonist #2787

Arguments advanced by Jack Copeland.
PAGE NAVIGATOR(Help)
Map HomeArtificial Intelligence
ProtagonistProtagonists
ProtagonistJack Copeland
AdvocacyA determined machine can still have free will
AdvocacyTuring's randomizer is only a tiebreaker
AdvocacyPrograms not universally realizable
AdvocacyThe Systems reply to the Chinese Gym
AdvocacyNeurons are diversely structured
AdvocacyThe "part-of" principle is fallacious
AdvocacyIntelligent machines could fail the test
AdvocacySome intelligent beings would fail the test
AdvocacyNondecisive tests can be useful
AdvocacySense organs not prohibited by Turing
AdvocacySome simulations are duplications
AdvocacyA man simulating a woman is not a woman
AdvocacyThe black box objection
AdvocacySUPER PARRY could pass Test by brute force
AdvocacyMachine prepared for repeated sentences
AdvocacyMachine prepared for subsitution tricks
AdvocacyThe beefed-up Turing Test
AdvocacyTuring in a car crash
CommentsAdd a comment
Metadata

Entered by:- David Price
Entry date (GMT): 7/20/2007 6:22:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT): 7/20/2007 6:22:00 PM
Incoming cross-relations: 0
Outgoing cross-relations: 18
Average rating: 0 by 0 users