Information theoretic explanation Position #112152

A number of physicists and philosophers have claimed that remembering - by humans or computers - can only occur in a rising-entropy environment. Such claims generally draw on the requirements for persisting and utilizing information. Two approaches to formally demonstrating this link are addressed.
In addition a number of physicists and philosophers have simply asserted that the psychological  (memory) arrow must align with the thermodynamic arrow - see citations below from Sean Carroll and J.J.C. Smart.
PAGE NAVIGATOR(Help)
Map HomeThe Arrow of Time
IssueThe experience of time
IssuePassage view components
IssueFlow and direction of time?
PositionMemory accretion hypothesis
ComponentDirection is that of memory accretion
IssueWhy aligned with thermodynamic arrow?
PositionInformation theoretic explanation
SupportiveArgumentArgument from computation
SupportiveArgumentQuantum argument
OpposingArgumentCausality, not entropy
OpposingArgumentRefrigerator objection
Citations
Time (article in Encyclopedia of Philosophy, MacMillan 1967)

Author: Smart, JJC
Cited by: Peter Baldwin 4:10 AM Thursday 25 August 2011 GMT
Also cited at: 113879
URL: http://www.jstor.org/pss/187375
Excerpt / Summary
The formation of a trace is the formation of a subsystem of temporarily lower entropy than that of its surroundings... A footprint in the sand is a temporarily highly ordered state of the sand; this orderliness is brought about at the expense of an increased disorderliness (metabolic depletion) of the pedestrian who made it... On investigation it will be seen that all sorts of traces, whether footprints in the sand, photographs, fossil bones, or the like can be understood as traces in this sense. Indeed, so are written records. The close connection between information and entropy is brought out in modern information theory, the mathematics of which is much the same as that of statistical mechanics.

Cited in Earman article on pp 41-2
Why can't we remember the future? (article excerpt)

Author: Sean M. Carroll - Theoretical physicist, California Institute of Technology
Cited by: Peter Baldwin 9:44 AM Friday 24 June 2011 GMT
Also cited at: 107148
URL:
Excerpt / Summary
"So the arrow of time isn’t just about simple mechanical processes; it’s a necessary feature of the existence of life itself. But it’s also responsible for a deep feature of what it means to be a conscious person: the fact that we remember the past, but not the future. According to the fundamental laws of physics, the past and future are treated on an equal footing; but when it comes to how we perceive the world, they couldn’t be more different. We carry in our heads representations of the past, in the form of memories. Concerning the future, we can make predictions, but those predictions have nowhere near the reliability of our memories of the past. Ultimately, the reason we can form a reliable memory of the past is that the entropy was lower then."
CommentsAdd a comment
Metadata

Entered by:- Peter Baldwin
Entry date (GMT): 6/24/2011 7:56:00 AM
Last edit date (GMT): 8/26/2011 4:19:00 AM
Incoming cross-relations: 2
Outgoing cross-relations: 0
Average rating: 4 by 1 users