Congressional funding of USIP illustrates how government waste thrives

Congressmen Jason Chaffetz and Anthony Weiner, writing in the Wall St Journal, argue that:

The USIP is a "a case study in how government waste thrives. The idea began during the Cold War as a modest proposal with $4 million in seed money. But the organization received government funding year after year essentially because it had been funded the year before—and because it had important allies.."

"...the level of taxpayer support that this private organization receives is excessive. Since 1985, taxpayers have forked over more than $720 million (inflation adjusted). That has included support for a gleaming new 150,000 square foot office building....".


CONTEXT(Help)
-
The Future of the US Institute of Peace »The Future of the US Institute of Peace
Congressional Funding of USIP? »Congressional Funding of USIP?
Withdraw Congressional funding »Withdraw Congressional funding
Necessary cost-saving measure »Necessary cost-saving measure
Congressional spending on USIP isn't cost-effective »Congressional spending on USIP isn't cost-effective
Congressional funding of USIP illustrates how government waste thrives
Congressional funding has continued and increased without oversight »Congressional funding has continued and increased without oversight
Taxpayer money has helped to build a prestigious new HQ for USIP »Taxpayer money has helped to build a prestigious new HQ for USIP
+Comments (0)
+Citations (0)
+About