Views
Graph
Explorer
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 levels
Load all levels
All
Dagre
Focus
Down
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Load 4 level
Load all levels
All
Tree
SpaceTree
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Radial
Focus
Expanding
Load 1 level
Load 2 levels
Load 3 levels
Down
All
Down
Box
Focus
Expanding
Down
Up
All
Down
Page ✓
Article
Outline
Document
Down
All
Canvas
Time
Timeline
Calendar
Request email digest
Past 24 hours
Past 2 days
Past 3 days
Past week
Add
Add page
Add comment
Add citation
Edit
Edit page
Delete page
Share
Link
Bookmark
Embed
Social media
Login
Member login
Register now for a free account
🔎
Jason Chaffetz
Protagonist
1
#100206
U.S. Representative (Republican) for Utah's 3rd congressional district, since 2009.
CONTEXT
(Help)
-
The Future of the US Institute of Peace »
The Future of the US Institute of Peace
The Future of the US Institute of Peace☜The future of the US Institute of Peace [USIP] is under scrutiny this month following a House of Representativess vote to withdraw USIPs public funding and disquiet over USIPs move into a new, prominent, purpose-built building in Washington, D.C. What should happen?☜F1CEB7
▲
Protagonists »
Protagonists
Protagonists☜Starting to identify some of the main protagonists / voices in the current debate about the future of the United States Institute of Peace.☜D3B8AB
▲
Politicians »
Politicians
Politicians☜☜D3B8AB
■
Jason Chaffetz
Jason Chaffetz☜U.S. Representative (Republican) for Utahs 3rd congressional district, since 2009.☜D3B8AB
►
Withdraw Congressional funding »
Withdraw Congressional funding
Withdraw Congressional funding☜Congressional funding of the United Sates Institute of Peace [USIP] should be withdrawn – in line with the bipartisan vote in the House of Representatives on 19 February 2011.☜FFFACD
►
USIP is a private organization »
USIP is a private organization
USIP is a private organization☜☜FFFACD
►
Congressional spending on USIP isn't cost-effective »
Congressional spending on USIP isn't cost-effective
Congressional spending on USIP isn't cost-effective☜Congressional funding of the USIP is not cost-effective compared to competing forms of public expenditure.☜FFFACD
Heading
Summary
Click the button to enter task scheduling information
Open
Details
Enter task details
Message text
Select assignee(s)
Due date (click calendar)
RadDatePicker
RadDatePicker
Open the calendar popup.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<
<
May 2024
>
<<
May 2024
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
18
28
29
30
1
2
3
4
19
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
20
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
21
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
22
26
27
28
29
30
31
1
23
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Reminder
No reminder
1 day before due
2 days before due
3 days before due
1 week before due
Ready to post
Copy to text
Enter
Cancel
Task assignment(s) have been emailed and cannot now be altered
Lock
Cancel
Save
Comment graphing options
Choose comments:
Comment only
Whole thread
All comments
Choose location:
To a new map
To this map
New map options
Select map ontology
Options
Standard (default) ontology
College debate ontology
Hypothesis ontology
Influence diagram ontology
Story ontology
Graph to private map
Cancel
Proceed
+Comments (
0
)
- Comments
Add a comment
Newest first
Oldest first
Show threads
+Citations (
0
)
- Citations
Add new citation
List by:
Citerank
Map
+About
- About
Entered by:-
David Price
NodeID:
#100206
Node type:
Protagonist
Entry date (GMT):
4/2/2011 9:29:00 PM
Last edit date (GMT):
4/3/2011 2:55:00 PM
Show other editors
Incoming cross-relations:
0
Outgoing cross-relations:
3
Average rating:
0
by
0
users
x
Select file to upload