Debategraph map: Hacked emails raise questions about flaws in the scientific process *

Sorry, you do not have the right version of Adobe Flash player to view the content below. In the interim, we have provided an HTML view of the same content. Click framed items to drill down the debate tree.

IPCC process isn't wholly reliable *º

The proccess behind the IPCC reports, on which much of the case for dangerous anthropengenic climate change rests, is not wholly reliable. (#5034)

Hacked emails raise questions about flaws in the scientific process *

(#39996)

Questions raised do not stand up to detailed scrutiny *º

(#42576)

Spec interests have $ to create uncertainty-influence political agenda

(#43490)

Hacked email refers to a "trick" to hide the decline *

"I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline." (#41347)

Hacked email suggests desire to suppress papers challenging orthodoxy *

(#39997)

Hacked emails suggest desire to withhold data from publiic scrutiny *º

(#41457)

Amanpour on Climate Change *º´

(#42664)

Call for a criminal investigation of climate change scientists *´

(#53275)